AI & Editorial Policy Update
Our Commitment to Quality, Accuracy and Transparency
Financial Regulation Courses (FRC) publishes educational content designed to support professionals preparing for regulatory examinations, developing their financial-services knowledge, and advancing their careers.Our subject matter includes financial regulation, securities, investment products, compliance, professional qualifications, regulatory examinations, and related areas of financial-services education. Because our educational materials may influence examination preparation, career decisions, professional development and, in some circumstances, professional practice, we recognise the importance of maintaining a high standard of accuracy, clarity, independence and accountability. As artificial intelligence continues to become an important part of modern content production, we believe learners and visitors should understand how these technologies are used within our editorial process. FRC therefore adopts a human-led, AI-assisted approach to content production. AI may assist our editorial and production teams, but it does not replace the expertise, judgment or responsibility of qualified human professionals.How We Use Artificial Intelligence
FRC uses modern AI technologies to support certain aspects of research, editorial development, content production and presentation.These technologies may include advanced language models and AI-assisted production platforms such as Anthropic's Claude and HeyGen.AI tools may be used to assist with tasks including: Structuring and organising educational material Developing initial outlines and content framework sImproving grammar, spelling and readabilityIdentifying opportunities to improve clarity and presentationSynthesising information from multiple research sources Assisting with explanations of complex concepts Supporting the development of educational questions and learning materialsAssisting with video production and presentationSupporting the preparation of alternative explanations and examples Assisting editorial teams in identifying areas requiring further review The use of AI does not mean that FRC treats AI-generated information as automatically accurate or suitable for publication.AI output is treated as an editorial resource that requires human assessment and validation.Written Educational Content
FRC produces a broad range of written educational material, including study guides, regulatory explainers, articles, examination-preparation material, quizzes, flashcards, reference material and educational resources.Where AI assistance is used, our editorial process may involve several stages.Relevant subject matter is researched using appropriate regulatory, educational, professional and authoritative sources.Where content concerns financial regulation or regulatory requirements, particular care is taken to ensure that the underlying information is appropriate to the jurisdiction and subject being discussed.Content is structured and planned with consideration given to the intended learner, educational objective, regulatory context and complexity of the subject.AI tools may be used to assist with drafting, restructuring, explaining, editing or refining material.AI may therefore contribute to the wording or presentation of some content.However, AI-generated text is Content is reviewed for accuracy, clarity, consistency and relevance.Where appropriate, technical content is cross-checked against authoritative sources and reviewed by individuals with relevant financial, regulatory, academic or professional expertise.Material is subject to human editorial oversight before publication.The final decision to publish, amend or reject material rests with FRC's human editorial leadership and relevant subject-matter professionals.FRC's educational content may be reviewed, validated or developed with input from professionals with relevant qualifications and experience. Depending on the subject matter, this may include professionals such as: CFA charterholders CISI members FINRA-registered practitioners Compliance specialists Senior academics Financial-services professionals Regulatory specialists Subject-matter experts with relevant industry experience The precise review process may vary according to the nature, complexity and purpose of the material. We do not suggest that every individual involved in every piece of content holds every qualification listed above. Rather, these represent examples of the professional expertise that may form part of FRC's broader editorial and technical review framework.Financial regulation is a continually evolving field.Rules, regulatory interpretations, examination specifications, guidance, legislation and professional standards may change over time.For that reason, FRC recognises that accuracy cannot be achieved simply by producing content once and leaving it permanently unchanged.Where appropriate, our editorial process includes reviewing material against relevant developments and updating educational content when significant changes occur. AI tools may assist in identifying information that requires review, but Such judgments remain matters for appropriate human review.FRC also uses AI-assisted video-production technologies to present educational and professional-development material in video format.This may include platforms such as HeyGen and other AI-assisted production technologies.AI may assist with elements of the production process, including:Presenter or avatar generationS ynthetic or AI-generated voicesVideo productionScript presentationVisual formatting Editing and production workflowsThe underlying educational content remains subject to human editorial oversight.Video scripts and narratives are researched and developed with consideration of the relevant financial or regulatory subject matter and are reviewed for technical accuracy and educational suitability before publication.Where a video contains realistic AI-generated or synthetic elements, such as an AI-presented avatar or synthetic voice, FRC may provide appropriate disclosure in accordance with the requirements of the platform on which the content is published. For example, where applicable, YouTube's disclosure mechanisms may be used.Our objective is not to conceal the use of AI.We believe learners should be able to distinguish between human-created and AI-assisted or synthetic presentation where that distinction is material to their understanding of the content.AI tools used by FRC are .They do not:Make independent decisions about what is factually or technically correctReplace professional judgmentDetermine regulatory interpretation on behalf of FRCAssume responsibility for the accuracy of educational materialReplace subject-matter expertiseRemove the need for editorial reviewServe as the final authority for financial or regulatory informationAI systems can produce inaccurate, incomplete, outdated or misleading information.Consequently, the presence of AI assistance within our production process does not alter FRC's expectation that published educational material should be appropriately reviewed. Artificial intelligence is capable of processing large quantities of information and producing sophisticated written and visual material. However, the ability to generate convincing content is not the same as professional expertise.Financial regulation frequently involves context, interpretation, jurisdictional distinctions, exceptions, historical developments and practical considerations that cannot safely be delegated to an automated system.FRC therefore considers AI to be an Our objective is to use technology where it improves efficiency and presentation while retaining human responsibility where expertise and judgment are required.Financial-services regulation does not remain static.Regulatory authorities may introduce new rules, amend existing requirements, issue guidance, change examination specifications or publish new interpretations. FRC therefore seeks to review and update relevant educational materials as developments occur.AI-assisted tools may help our editorial teams identify material that may require attention, but any substantive update remains subject to appropriate human assessment.Where an update affects the educational meaning of existing material, the relevant content may be reviewed and revised before being republished.Despite our editorial processes, no educational publisher can guarantee that every piece of information will remain permanently accurate or that an error will never occur.If you believe that an FRC article, study resource, examination question, video or other educational material contains an error, we encourage you to notify us.Reports of potential errors may be reviewed by the appropriate member of our editorial or subject-matter team.Where an error or material inaccuracy is identified, we may correct or update the relevant content.This process forms part of our commitment to continuous improvement.Used appropriately, AI can provide significant advantages in the development and presentation of educational material. At FRC, our use of AI is intended to help us: Explain complex regulatory concepts more clearlyPresent information in multiple educational formats Improve consistency across large volumes of educational material Develop learning resources more efficiently Identify material that may require updating Support faster editorial workflows Improve the accessibility and presentation of educational information Help learners engage with difficult financial and regulatory concepts The objective is not simply to produce more content. FRC's approach can be summarised simply: We believe this provides a practical balance between the capabilities of modern artificial intelligence and the professional standards required when producing financial and regulatory education.Technology can improve speed, scale and presentation.Professional expertise provides judgment, context and accountability.We believe the combination of both can produce stronger educational resources than either approach used in isolation.Our AI and editorial practices may evolve as technology, regulatory expectations, publishing standards and industry practices develop.We will continue to review our approach to AI-assisted content production and may update this policy when appropriate. Any future changes to this policy will be reflected in the date shown at the beginning of this document. Our commitment, however, remains consistent: If you have questions about how FRC produces its educational content, how AI is used within our editorial process, or if you believe you have identified an error or an area where our material could be improved, please contact us. We welcome constructive feedback from learners, instructors, financial-services professionals, academics and other industry participants.We regularly review our educational materials and editorial processes with the objective of maintaining a high standard of quality, accuracy and transparency.