The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) are an internationally recognised framework for addressing the human rights responsibilities of businesses worldwide. Endorsed by the United Nations Human Rights Council in June 2011, the UNGPs set out a clear, structured approach to prevent and address the risk of adverse human rights impacts linked to business activities. They are built around three pillars: the state's duty to protect human rights, the corporate responsibility to respect human rights, and the need for effective access to remedies for those affected by human rights violations. Below is a detailed exploration of the UNGPs, their principles, and their practical implications for businesses and states alike.
Background of the UNGPs
The UNGPs were developed by Professor John Ruggie, the UN Secretary-General’s Special Representative on Business and Human Rights. Their creation was driven by the need for a global standard to address the human rights abuses that have historically been associated with business operations, particularly in sectors such as mining, agriculture, and manufacturing. Prior to the adoption of the UNGPs, there was no universal framework to guide businesses in their human rights responsibilities.
The UNGPs are non-binding, but they have gained widespread support from states, businesses, and civil society organisations. They are the most authoritative global standard on business and human rights and have influenced national laws, international frameworks, and corporate policies worldwide.
The Three Pillars of the UNGPs
The UNGPs are structured around three interrelated pillars, which together provide a comprehensive approach to business and human rights. These pillars are:
The State Duty to Protect Human Rights: Governments have a legal obligation to protect individuals from human rights abuses committed by third parties, including businesses. Under the UNGPs, states are expected to take appropriate steps to prevent, investigate, and punish such abuses through effective laws, policies, and enforcement mechanisms. This includes ensuring that businesses operating within their jurisdiction respect human rights and that victims of abuses have access to justice.
The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: Businesses, regardless of size, sector, or geographic location, have a responsibility to respect human rights. This means that companies should avoid infringing on human rights through their operations, and they should address any adverse human rights impacts that occur. The UNGPs call on businesses to implement policies and processes that allow them to identify, prevent, mitigate, and account for how they address human rights risks. This is often referred to as human rights due diligence.
Access to Remedy: Victims of business-related human rights abuses must have access to effective remedies. The UNGPs outline both judicial and non-judicial mechanisms for addressing grievances. States are encouraged to provide access to courts and other legal remedies, while businesses are urged to create grievance mechanisms that allow individuals to raise concerns and seek redress.
The State Duty to Protect Human Rights
The first pillar of the UNGPs focuses on the state’s role in preventing and addressing business-related human rights abuses. States are required to establish and enforce legal frameworks that protect against human rights violations. This includes ensuring that businesses respect labour rights, environmental standards, and anti-corruption laws. The state duty to protect is essential because businesses often operate across borders, making it difficult for a single jurisdiction to hold them accountable.
The UNGPs emphasise that states should take additional steps to protect vulnerable groups, such as women, children, indigenous peoples, and migrant workers. Governments are also encouraged to engage with businesses, civil society, and other stakeholders to ensure that human rights are upheld throughout supply chains and in foreign operations.
One of the key recommendations of the UNGPs is the incorporation of human rights clauses in trade agreements, investment treaties, and state-owned enterprise operations. This ensures that human rights considerations are built into the economic frameworks that govern business activities.
The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights
The second pillar of the UNGPs establishes that businesses have a responsibility to respect human rights, meaning they must actively work to avoid harming individuals through their operations or business relationships. The corporate responsibility to respect applies to all companies, regardless of their size, sector, or location.
The UNGPs encourage businesses to adopt a policy commitment to respect human rights, which should be reflected in their corporate governance structures. Companies are also urged to conduct human rights due diligence, a process through which they identify, prevent, mitigate, and address the negative impacts their activities might have on people.
Human rights due diligence involves:
Identifying potential human rights risks: Businesses should assess the risks of their operations, particularly in areas with weak governance or conflict zones, where human rights violations are more likely to occur.
Preventing and mitigating risks: Once risks are identified, businesses must take proactive steps to prevent human rights abuses. This could involve adjusting supply chain policies, revising employee contracts, or engaging with local communities to understand their concerns.
Tracking performance: Companies need to monitor the effectiveness of their policies and procedures to ensure they are effectively addressing human rights risks.
Reporting: Transparency is crucial, and businesses should report on their human rights efforts, including the outcomes of their due diligence processes. This helps build trust with stakeholders and ensures accountability.
The UNGPs also make it clear that the responsibility to respect human rights extends to a company’s business relationships, including suppliers, contractors, and joint ventures. Businesses are expected to use their leverage to influence these entities to respect human rights.
Access to Remedy
The third pillar of the UNGPs focuses on ensuring that victims of human rights abuses linked to business activities can seek justice and redress. This pillar highlights the importance of effective grievance mechanisms, which can be judicial or non-judicial in nature.
States are expected to provide access to judicial remedies, such as courts and tribunals, where individuals can seek compensation for human rights violations. The UNGPs also encourage the creation of non-judicial grievance mechanisms, such as mediation and arbitration, to resolve disputes more efficiently and at a lower cost.
For businesses, the UNGPs recommend that companies establish their own grievance mechanisms to address concerns from employees, local communities, and other stakeholders. These mechanisms should be:
Legitimate: They should be trusted by all stakeholders and operate transparently.
Accessible: Individuals should know how to access the mechanism and understand how it works.
Predictable: The process should follow a clear, predictable path to resolution.
Equitable: The mechanism should ensure that all parties have an equal opportunity to present their case and receive fair treatment.
Transparent: Businesses should keep stakeholders informed about the status of grievances and the outcomes of the resolution process.
Implementation and Challenges
While the UNGPs have been widely endorsed, implementing them remains a challenge for many businesses and governments. The main challenges include:
Complex supply chains: Many multinational corporations operate across multiple jurisdictions and sectors, making it difficult to monitor human rights conditions at every level of the supply chain.
Weak governance in certain regions: In areas where governments are unable or unwilling to enforce human rights protections, businesses may struggle to meet the expectations set out by the UNGPs.
Lack of resources: Smaller businesses, in particular, may lack the resources or expertise to conduct effective human rights due diligence.
Accountability: The voluntary nature of the UNGPs means that enforcement relies heavily on reputational risks and consumer pressure, rather than legal penalties. This can limit their effectiveness in addressing serious human rights abuses.
Despite these challenges, many businesses have begun to integrate the UNGPs into their operations, recognising that responsible human rights practices can enhance their reputation, reduce legal risks, and improve relationships with stakeholders.
Bringing It All Together
The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) provide a clear and structured approach for businesses to respect human rights, while also outlining the state’s duty to protect individuals from business-related abuses. The UNGPs, built around the pillars of protection, respect, and remedy, offer an essential framework for ensuring that human rights are not compromised by business activities. While they are voluntary, the widespread endorsement of the UNGPs reflects their importance in shaping responsible corporate behaviour globally. As businesses continue to operate in increasingly complex environments, adherence to the UNGPs will remain critical for ensuring that human rights are protected and respected.
Learn how ESG influences human rights practices in business with our ESG Advisor Certification.